Sunday, May 20, 2018

"Lieu cited the Ninth Circuit’s 2014 ruling in Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox, which found that bloggers have the same free speech protections as traditional press. ”That was a pretty awesome and amazing opinion,” he said. “And that’s the kind of things we see out of the Ninth Circuit.”

"WASHINGTON (CN) – Capitol Hill’s crosshairs turned Thursday on the Ninth Circuit just a day after a federal judge under the court’s purview became the latest to thwart efforts by the president to block Muslim immigration.

The Ninth Circuit had already earned criticism from the White House in February after it ruled 3-0 against the first iteration of President Donald Trump’s travel ban.

When a federal judge on Hawaii issued an injunction against the revised executive order Wednesday, Trump complained that night at a campaign-style rally in Nashville that his new travel ban had been tailored to the “much-overturned” circuit’s “flawed ruling.”

The Ninth Circuit is the largest federal appeals court in the country, overseeing far-flung federal courts in Hawaii, Alaska, the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam, as well as those in Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state.

Last month’s ruling had Trump to blast the Ninth Circuit as “in chaos” and “frankly in turmoil.” Republicans have long said the court is too big, too liberal and too slow, and they have tried for decades to break it up.

At a hearing Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee on how to restructure the court, a partisan debate erupted over the GOP’s claims that Ninth Circuit rulings are overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court more so than often than any other federal appeals court.

Vanderbilt University Law School professor Brian Fitzpatrick said he has been tracking reversal rates for several decades.

“The numbers did not look good for the Ninth Circuit back then, and they still don’t look good today,” Fitzpatrick said in written testimony. “For the last 20 years, the Ninth Circuit has been the most reversed circuit in America — and it isn’t even close.”

Numbers compiled by the fact-checking organization Politifact dispute this. It says the Supreme Court reversed 70 percent of all cases it heard from 2010-15. Though the average for the Ninth Circuit was slightly higher than that at 79 percent, it was not the highest. Two other courts clock in ahead of it.

The Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit had an 87 percent reversal rate, followed by the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit with an 85 percent ruling reversal.

Indeed the Ninth Circuit is only narrowly ahead of the 78 percent reversal rate featured by the court in fourth place, the Philadelphia-based Third Circuit.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., put the Ninth Circuit statistics a different way.

“Less than one-tenth of 1 percent of Ninth Circuit decisions are overturned by the Supreme Court,” he said.

This led him to ask the panel’s five witnesses – including three federal judges from the Ninth Circuit: “Does that stat give weight to the president’s opinion, or should the courts stand up to the executive when necessary?”

“Judicial independence is important,” said U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas, the Ninth Circuit’s chief. “And I know this committee has recognized that.”

Thomas declined to address the second part of the question.

When asked how splitting the court could affect public perception of the courts as a fair and neutral arbiter, Thomas said such a move would diminish public respect for the rule of law.

“No question about that,” he said. “I hope this committee won’t engage in that kind of endeavor,” he added.

John Eastman, director of the Chapman University Fowloer School of Law, meanwhile regaled the congressmen with other problems the Ninth Circuit faces. Because of its caseload, the circuit takes 50 percent longer than the others to move from appeal to ruling, with that process spanning 18 months.

Describing the Ninth Circuit as the “Wild West,” Eastman said that collegiality among judges also suffers in the Ninth Circuit because the constant caseload buries its 29 judges.

On top of that, Eastman said the extraordinarily high combination of three-judge panels – 17,296 to be exact – prevents a coherent body of law from emerging, and undermines the circuit’s ability to get the law right. 

Because of the high number of opinions, practitioners have a hard time keeping up, which gives rise to intracircuit conflicts.

“Collegiality thus serves to check the tendencies of some judges to ‘fly solo,’ ruling according to their personal views rather than the clear commands of the law,” Eastman’s written testimony states.

Thomas, along with U.S. Circuit Judges Carlos Bea and Alex Kozinski, strenuously disputed the notion that their circuit is inefficient, or that case law is inconsistent.

“A decision by our court binds courts and litigants in the whole Western area,” Bea said.

“This minimizes the risk that the law of intellectual property – copyrights and trademarks, for instance – maritime trade, labor relations, employment discrimination, for instance – will be different in Phoenix, San Francisco or Seattle,” he added.

Splitting the court could even affect fishermen, he said.

“What law will rule Lake Tahoe, evenly split between California and Nevada,” he asked. “Will the tackle used by a Nevada fisherman be an illegal lure if his boat drifts into California waters?”

“This predictability and uniformity of law based on diversity of thought and backgrounds of the judges would suffer under any balkanization of the circuit,” he said.

Meanwhile, Kozinski told the committee that the size of the circuit has forced it to take advantage of modern technology – like video and live streams of court hearings – to bring justice closer to the people.

When the circuit heard the appeal of Trump’s first travel ban, Kozinski noted that 137,300 people used the court’s website to hear the audio stream of the oral arguments.

CNN’s live broadcast of the hearing had 1.5 million viewers, and another 138,615 people listened to the recording of the hearing.

“Think about that,” Kozinski said. “Well over 2 million people from all over the country and beyond listened to a 60-minute oral argument.”

All three judges expressed their opposition to splitting the Ninth Circuit up.

Sens. Jeff Flake and John McCain, both of Arizona, sponsored the legislation to spin off a new circuit for Nevada, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Alaska and Arizona.

That would leave only California, Hawaii, Oregon, the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam in the Ninth Circuit.

In explaining reversal rates, Eastman testified that size matters as much as the ideological make-up of the court. The bigger court, the lower the quality of its output, he said, citing a 2000 paper in the Journal of Legal Studies by the Seventh Circuit’s ever-popular Judge Richard Posner.

Chicago-based Posner found that the Ninth Circuit’s reversal rate was six times higher than the other circuits between 1985 and 1997.

There were no state additions to the Ninth Circuit during those years, but five additional judgeships were authorized in 1984. The court did not have another judgeship authorized until 2009.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked the judges if Posner got it wrong.

Thomas said size absolutely does not affect the quality of judicial output.

“I think that our deliberations now are even better than when I joined the court, because of technology,” he responded.

Kozinski said he respects Posner, but that “Dick and I disagree all the time on all sorts of things.”

Saying the model his colleague used is only as good as his inputs, Kozinski accused Posner of focusing too much on size while ignoring context.

President Jimmy Carter had from 1977 to 1981 appointed 11 of the “most liberal judges the world has ever seen,” while the Supreme Court was moving in the opposite direction, Kozinksi said.

Chaffetz defended Trump’s attack on the Ninth Circuit amid rulings against his travel ban from it and lower courts in its clutches.

“The president was duly given, by Congress, the authority to protect our borders,” Chaffetz said. “And for these injunctions to come in place and prevent the president from doing his job is absolutely totally wrong.”

Noting that California is a populous and progressive state, and that appeals courts cannot pick and choose cases like the Supreme Court does, Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., underscored the importance of the Ninth Circuit for taking on cases that “push the envelope” and “challenge the status quo.”

“That’s certainly right,” Kozinski said. “And of course that would be exacerbated if California were isolated,” he added, noting that one of the reasons for having regional circuits is so that no single state dominates.  

To drive his point home, Lieu cited the Ninth Circuit’s 2014 ruling in Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox, which found that bloggers have the same free speech protections as traditional press.

”That was a pretty awesome and amazing opinion,” he said. “And that’s the kind of things we see out of the Ninth Circuit.”

Source
https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-gets-frankencourt-treatment-house/

Thursday, February 8, 2018

The Parties who Brought the District of Illinois Lawsuit KNEW from the start that they were filing in the WRONG Jurisdiction. Pamela Simon of STP Enterprises, Ted Bernstein Boca Raton, David Simon, Adam Simon, Scott Wellington of Jackson National and more involved in what sure seems to be Insurance Fraud to me, among other alleged Crimes. Stay Tuned as the TRUTH keeps rolling out and one day there will be the Ears of True Justice to Hear and Justice will be Served.

Eliot Bernstein was ALWAYS, Clearly a Beneficiary.

All the Attorneys, Judges, Guardians, Life Insurance Companies and others involved in all of this will someday be held accountable, it is simply how the TRUTH works. The Truth rises to the Top so we can all see it Clearly.

Plaintiff Ted Bernstein knowingly stated false facts to the Illinois Court and the Court simply took those statements as fact, with no lower court ruling or proof, and with no Trust, and NO Life Insurance Policy. This District of Illinois Case seems to set a precedent whereby anyone can get life insurance on anyone, or claim they had it and have no policy, and even in a case where there was murder alleged and a toxic coroners report. WOW.

Seems to be a Clear Case of Fraud on the Court and Insurance Fraud, as far as I See it.




Source
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibnZDMXh5SXB3a0pMYzlLU1o4UGZWRF9WdU1n/view?usp=sharing

Heritage Life Insurance, Jackson National Life Insurance and the case of the "friendly" carrier that Pam Simon claimed to have. No Policy or Trust needed apparently.

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

Never Forget the Kimberly Moran Story regarding Kimberly Moran a Florida Notary for the law firm of Tescher and Spallina Law Firm. She was found guilty of Forgery and Fraud, the document she forged was to the benefit of Ted Bernstein, client of Alan Rose of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, ROSE, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss Law Firm .

From all I have read and seen over the last 5 years or so reporting on this Florida Probate case, I fully believe that Donald Tescher and Robert Spallina ordered the notary to forge the documents, as they were her bosses at that time.

NOW Fast Forward to Early 2018 and WOW, Ted Bernstein and his attorney Alan Rose of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, ROSE, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss seemed to have used this incident to further benefit client Ted Bernstein and to the detriment of other beneficiaries. This done via a secret confidential settlement with Tescher and Spallina for 2 different estates, the Estate of Simon Bernstein and the Estate of Shirley Bernstein. The secret settlement agreement was alleged to have been done in July of 2016 as stated by Alan Rose.

Sure am curious as to how this went down. I mean the acts that Tescher and Spallina did actually benefited Ted Bernstein, Alan's client. I would go so far as to say that Ted was involved in Tescher and Spallina forging the document, just speculating, and then years later a settlement with Ted's attorney .. ???

So what about this Kimberly Moran Story:

Kimberly Moran, Notary for Tescher and Spallina State of Florida Notary Suspension
http://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/orders/2013/13_291_moran.pdf

Kimberly Moran was arrested and went through this process due to the actions of Eliot Bernstein. The fraud and forgery that Kimberly Moran committed benefited Ted Bernstein. Alan Rose of the Law Firm of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, ROSE, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss is and has been the attorney for Ted Bernstein.  The forgery fraud that Kimberly Moran, Notary for Tescher and Spallina committed seems to me to have benefited TED directly.

Kimberly Moran Legal Assistant & Florida Notary Public Employed by Tescher & Spallina P.A. Arrested by Palm Beach County Sheriff Forgery & Fraudulent Notarization License SUSPENDED by Governor Rick Scott Notary Public Division in the Estate of Shirley Bernstein before Judge Martin Colin
http://iviewit.tv/ShirleyBernstein/?p=30

ARREST has been made in the Estate of Shirley Bernstein Florida for FRAUDULENT NOTARIZATIONS and admitted FORGERIES of five documents in our names and one in our father’s name, which was FORGED POST MORTEM for him by Donald and Roberts Legal Assistant and Notary Public, Kimberly Moran.
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/12/response-to-ted-and-donald-letters-re.html

ARREST have been made in the Estate of Shirley Bernstein Boca Raton Florida for FRAUDULENT NOTARIZATIONS and admitted FORGERIES of five documents, which was FORGED POST MORTEM  by Donald and Roberts Legal Assistant and Notary Public, Kimberly Moran.
Response to Florida Governor in Kimberly Moran Notary Fraud, Forgery Case
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiOVFPR0I0YllQUFU/edit?usp=sharing

Donald Tescher Filed a Bar Complaint with the Florida Bar against Robert Spallina, his then partner in the law firm Tescher and Spallina. Donald Tescher Filed this complaint January 15th 2014. Regarding Trust Document Tampering. The Document tampered with was to the benefit of Alan Roses' Client Ted Bernstein. And the detriment of Eliot Bernstein and other beneficiaries. Click Below to Read Bar Complaint
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkidHR0cDUxS1JBRG8/view?usp=sharing


Below is the Revocation filing for Robert Spallina, Florida State Bar

"B. The Florida Bar File No. 2014-50,885{15E)
1. Petitiorier added a paragraph to his client's Trust Amendment
after the client was deceased in an effort to comply with the
client's wishes.

2. The Trust Amendment was presented to the Court by another
attorney at which point Petitioner admitted to his wrongdoing."

Source
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkidHR0cDUxS1JBRG8/view


"Three disciplinary matters hung over Robert Spallina (Loyola Marymount University Law School, 2000), who pleaded guilty to securities fraud after engaging in insider trading and admitted adding a paragraph to a trust amendment after a client was dead to comply with the client’s wishes. So, Spallina opted for disciplinary revocation, which is similar disbarment. He can apply for reinstatement Oct. 30, 2021."
http://www.barcomplaint.com/article-of-interest-copypaste-ok/what-did-these-lawyers-do-wrong-the-florida-bar-has-made-its-case-miami-dade-county/


SEC Criminal Complaint Documents in Bar Complaint
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkic2pfM2l0Z2F6V3M/view

More about Robert Spallina in all this Madness
http://robertspallina.blogspot.com


Heritage Union Life Insurance Company and Jackson National have known about all this fraud, murder allegations, millions in life insurance and no policy, a "friendly" carrier claimed by Pam Simon of STP and more. Why they let the Fraud go on, well that will have to wait to be revealed, but I am guessing it will come out some day.  From who? Don't know, maybe Don Sanders, one can never know where the Truth will surface. Some research below to ponder for now, while the TRUTH is awaiting arrival.

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2014/06/heritage-union-life-insurance-company.html

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.ie/2014/05/does-jackson-national-life-insurance.html

Judge Martin Colin aided and abetted the criminal activities as I see it, in the Estate of Shirley Bernstein, the Estate of Simon Bernstein and all the fraud, forgery, civil rights violations, predatory guardianship and more. Colin knew all along, as did Judge John Phillips, then head of the Guardianship Program.

Court Hearing Regarding Deceased Signing Documents


September 17th 2013 Hearing

"THE COURT: So final disposition and the
 order got entered that Simon, your father ‐‐

21 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: Yes, sir.

22 THE COURT: ‐‐ he came to court and said I
23 want to be discharged, my wife's estate is
24 closed and fully administered.

25 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: No. I think it
1 happened after ‐‐

THE COURT: No, I'm looking at it.

3 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: What date did that
4 happen?

THE COURT: January 3, 2013.

6 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: He was dead.

MR. MANCERI: That's when the order was
8 signed, yes, your Honor.

9 THE COURT: He filed it, physically came
10 to court.

11 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: Oh.

12 THE COURT: So let me see when he actually
13 filed it and signed the paperwork. November.
14 What date did your dad die?

15 MR. ELIOT BERNSTEIN: September. It's
16 hard to get through. He does a lot of things
17 when he's dead.

18 THE COURT: I have all of these waivers by
19 Simon in November. He tells me Simon was dead
20 at the time.

21 MR. MANCERI: Simon was dead at the time,
22 your Honor. The waivers that you're talking
23 about are waivers from the beneficiaries, I
24 believe.

25 THE COURT: No, it's waivers of
1 accountings.

2 MR. MANCERI: Right, by the beneficiaries.

3 THE COURT: Discharge waiver of service of
4 discharge by Simon, Simon asked that he not
5 have to serve the petition for discharge.

6 MR. MANCERI: Right, that was in his
7 petition. When was the petition served?
8 THE COURT: November 21st.

9 MR. SPALLINA: Yeah, it was after his date
10 of death.

11 THE COURT: Well, how could that happen
12 legally? How could Simon ‐‐

13 MR. MANCERI: Who signed that?

14 THE COURT: ‐‐ ask to close and not serve
15 a petition after he's dead?  "

Click to Read Full Hearing Transcript and source of above quote, the above starts on page 14
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiV2t


Kimberly Moran, Florida Notary Public involved in Fraud, Forgery, Estate Fraud ..
Motion to Freeze Assets in Shirley Bernstein Estate. Judge Martin Colin did NOTHING.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia3dyOGs4MnowODg/edit


DO NOT BELIEVE A WORD I SAY. 
DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK. 
READ THE DOCUMENTED PROOF AND 
THINK FOR YOURSELF. 


THEY ALL KNOW, KNEW and / or participated AND DID NOTHING

Mark Manceri, Judge Martin Colin, Robert Spallina, Donald Tescher, Guardian Diana Lewis, Ted Bernstein, Pamela SimonDavid Simon, Deborah Bernstein, Laurence Pino, Judge John Phillips, Judge David French, Attorney Ashley Crispin, Attorney Brian O'Connell, Attorney John Pankauski, Attorney Steven Lessne, JP Morgan, Oppenheimer, Life Insurance Concepts, Life Cycle Financial Planners, STP Enterprises and a whole lot more law firms, insurance companies and individuals have been involved in what sure seems to be massive fraud, forgery, predatory guardian ship, civil rights violations, murder, theft, and more in South Florida. Do your Homework folks. These Judges, Guardians and Attorneys involved in the Estate of Simon Bernstein Case, have been doing this to countless victims for decades. 

Click Here to Scour Details of this Case
the Ted Bernstein Report by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

Friday, January 19, 2018

Arthur R Redgrave Attorney Boca Raton, Elayne Russell, Lawrence Frieder and yet another case in West Palm County Florida of attorneys using our courts to flat out steal money.

Redgrave & Rosenthal Boca Raton Attorney Arthur Redgrave

Judge Jessica Ticktin

Fraudulent Will? Got a Tip? eMail me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com

Theft and Perjury? Is there no oversight in Florida? There are massive amounts of attorneys, guardians, judges, nurses, and more involved in bilking the elderly in Florida and in dividing families and flat out stealing inheritances.

William E. Stansbury, Bill Stansbury v. Ted Bernstein and the Estate of Simon Bernstein, Alan Rose Attorney for Both. Florida Insurance Legal Action. Read Complaint Below and Stay Tuned for Lot's More.

Monday, December 11, 2017

Matt Zirzow, Zacharia Larson; Marc Randazza Bankruptcy motion seeking to discover "ASSETS and unearthing FRAUDS".

Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson of Larson & Zirzow, Las Vegas Bankruptcy attorneys for Debtor Marc J. Randazza have participated in Extreme Discrimination against a Pro Se Litigant, and Extreme Retaliation against a Former Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group client, me, Crystal Cox.

Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson have NOT sought any sort of Malicious behavior ruling against Liberty Media Holdings or their attorney James D. Greene Greene Infuso, LLP, Nor has Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson sought a ruling of malicious behavior against Wendy Medura Krincek of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. for Claiming that FRAUD may exist and hidden assets may exist, yet Zirzow & Larson did so to me, Crystal Cox, completely spiteful, malicious and with deliberate intentional fraud and abuse of the courts. 

Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson assisted Marc Randazza to use the bankruptcy courts to dissolve debt in favor of Creditors Randazza Legal Group, Ronald D. Green, and F. Chris Austin and Weide & Miller by aggressively placing a judgement against me to pay aprox. $500,000 in legal fees, for the Jennifer Brochey Randazza and Marc Randazza for 5 years of legal service suing me, Crystal Cox.
(See Doc. 44 and 45 Adv.16-01111)

Jennifer Brochey Randazza and Marc Randazza had no actual grounds to sue me, Crystal Cox and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein.  (See 2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL Doc. 200)
http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf

Jennifer Brochey Randazza and Marc Randazza was awarded an Unconstitutional TRO to STEAL massive online content, search engine placement, domain names and intellectual property. All because I spoke critical of my former attorney Marc J. Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group, poked fun, made parody and reviewed my personal experience. Full Docket of that case

I WAS DEEMED MALICIOUS AND MARC RANDAZZA GOT PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND 5 YEARS OF LEGAL FEES AWARDED TO HIM AND JENNIFER RANDAZZA FOR SUING ME IN 2012, A CASE OF WHICH IS STILL PENDING. Other Creditors made similar claims and they don't have to pay the Randazza's legal fees nor punitive for hurting Marc's feelings, ONLY ME.
Crystal Cox Objection to Fees.
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.29.0.pdf

Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson are not Ethical, Fair, Upstanding Attorneys, in fact they are helping an attorney who supports pedophiles and revenge porn and is part of the human trafficking community.  Zirzow and Larson have joined the ranks of attorneys who abuse woman who stand up to the Evils of the Porn Industry, who stand up to Porn attorney Marc Randazza.

Wendy Medura Krincek, Esq. of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorney for Excelsior Media Corp. AND  James D. Greene Greene Infuso, LLP attorney for Liberty Media Holdings filed the Following Motion, raising questions about Debtor Marc Randazza's ownership interests in certain entities, a marital pre-nuptial agreement with Jennifer Brochey Randazza and certain financial dealings.

The Motion regarding Examination of Marc Randazza also raises questions about certain pre-petition activities of Debtor Marc J. Randazza and assets listed or, perhaps not listed, on his schedules.

A motion filed for the “purpose of discovering assets and unearthing frauds.” AND aimed at “obtaining information that will ... potentially uncover additional claims that may exist for the benefit of the estate”. Yet Zirzow & Larson maliciously got a half a million dollar JUDGMENT against me, Pro Se Litigant Crystal Cox, Creditor 13, for making those same claims. 

Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson have enabled Marc Randazza to commit what sure looks to be bankruptcy fraud to me, and certainly is unethical, malicious retaliation, cruel, dishonest and most certainly on the WRONG side of the Moral Compass. Using the power of the bankruptcy courts to punish women who stand up to the Evil Deeds of Porn Attorney and Pedophile Supporter Marc Randazza. 

Click Below to Read the Motion Filed
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.187.0.pdf

Crystal Cox, Creditor 13, Motion Objecting to Discharge of Marc Randazza Debt
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.29.0.pdf


I have VALID claims against my former attorney Marc Randazza, check out my story
https://crystalcoxclaimsagainstmarcrandazza.blogspot.com/

Keep an Eye on Marc Randazza's Bankruptcy
https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/

Marc Randazza held himself out as my attorney, he bullied me to STOP me from appealing for his own gain, he ran over my rights and when I FIRED Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, he sued me, threatened me, attacked me, launched a 5 year and counting malicious cyber attack and still seems to by lying about all to Federal Courts. Take a Look
https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/2017/11/marc-randazza-held-himself-out-as-my.html


Have a Tip?
Please eMail any and ALL tips regarding Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson, Jennifer Randazza Brochey, Marc Randazza, Ronald Green, Randazza Legal Group, F. Chris Austin and Wiede & Miller. I am Looking for ANY and ALL Tips.    ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com 

Sunday, December 3, 2017

Guardian Diana Lewis former Judge Diana Lewis of Palm Beach County Florida Ignores Cease and Desist, Claims she does not know the laws in Florida that Govern Guardianship and I Allege has enabled PR Brian O'Connell and Ted Bernstein's attorney Alan Rose to violate the rights of those involved in the Estate of Simon Bernstein and the Estate of Shirley Bernstein in Judge Rosemarie Scher's Court in South Florida.

Florida Guardian Diana Lewis does not seem to know Florida Guardianship LAW though she was a probate Judge and has superior knowledge of the law and extensive experience in these matters.

Guardian Diana Lewis took Guardianship of Adults with no proper GAL hearing as Florida Law regulates, as I see it. Research all the documents and the law and decide for yourself if former Judge Diana Lewis, now Predatory Guardian Diana Lewis followed Florida Guardianship LAW.

Diana Lewis does not think she has to notify the court when a ward turns 18 nor submit any reports.

Diana Lewis, long time family friend of PR Brian O'Connell, was called by an attorney and I allege brought into the Estate of Simon Bernstein Case in order to ensure that PR Brian O'Connell and Attorney Alan Rose got their way and their fees.


Despite a Cease and Desist Letter and in what seems to be a total disregard of law and in full knowledge of Florida Statutes, Civil and Constitutional Rights Diana Lewis made life changing decisions for those she took guardianship over, competent, able bodied adults.

As far as I know she never spoke with the men whose lives she has changed and who she took CONTROL of financial decisions for.

I Allege, that Guardian Diana Lewis was called by attorneys as she admits, and then started a business and became a guardian SPECIFICALLY for this case. There was no random selection or guardianship wheel and she was not even a Guardian for others at that time.

Diana Lewis's Guardianship business did not exist before this. Diana Lewis, I allege, was only in this case to SILENCE her PREY, her wards and make sure they had no rights or voice to stand up to the actions of attorney Alan Rose for Ted Bernstein of Boca Raton and PR Brian O'Connell, along with Ashley Crispin, both of Crispin, Ciklin Lubitz & O'Connell.

Guardian Diana Lewis is a former Judge and SHOULD have high ethically standards and superior knowledge of the law in this and related matters. However, she has blatantly violated the rights of those whose lives she took control over and with seemingly total disregard for the law. Almost as if she believes that she is not accountable, has no fiduciary duty and has been assured by Brian O'Connell and Alan Rose (as I myself heard Alan say) that she will get paid, and seemingly she is above the law and will have no consequences.

However, I am here to say that is NOT TRUE.

All will be held accountable, and these young, able bodied, of sound mind men whose lives she recklessly violated will see accountability at some point, as the TRUTH is NOT going away on my WATCH. No Way No How.

Check Out More on Guardian Diana Lewis's blatant disregard for Florida Law and for the Civil and Constitutional Rights of her wards (victims). And Read the Cease and Desist Letter she got, yet still claims she don't know the LAW governing her actions of Guardianship.


Guardian Diana Lewis former Judge Diana Lewis of Palm Beach County Florida blog by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Click Below to Read More.
http://GuardianDianaLewis.blogspot.com/

Saturday, November 18, 2017

The Ethics and Morals of Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners.

The Truth About Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners.

Folks, Read the TRUTH for Yourself. 

Don't TRUST anyone with what is TRUE for you. DO your own Homework, your own Due Diligence and Trust Yourself knowing you have done your homework.

Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners claims to be able to do right by your FAMILY and to protect YOUR WEALTH. However, that is simply not True as I See It.

Read all of this blog, don't believe me, Believe YOURSELF. Read the documents, see what Ted Bernstein is involved in, understand what is happening in South Florida Courts and what probate courts and attorneys connected to them are really doing.

Check out the Illinois Federal Case on this blog. 2 million paid by Heritage Life Insurance / Jackson Life Insurance and NO POLICY

The Judges and Attorneys, Insurance Brokers, Title Companies, Brokers involved in the Simon Bernstein Estate Case, many have admitted or been caught with wrong doing, some fraud and forgery as you will see in documents.

I can sit here all day and call names and blather about whatever I want, who cares what I "think" or what I "believe". Read the documents for yourself and decide if Ted Bernstein  Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners

I, Crystal Cox, have no need for YOU, the Reader to Believe me or NOT. My blogs are to protect the public at large. I have been reporting on what I deem as Corruption for 17 years now. Believe Me, don't believe me. I sincerely do not care.

What I do care about is that you know what is really going on in the courts, in your real estate transactions, in probate and estate cases, in insurance policies issued for 2 million WITH NO POLICY, in millions paid out with NO TRUST. I want YOU, the reader to educate yourself so that NONE of what is on this blog happens to you or those you love. Knowledge is Power.

Do NOT be a VICTIM of the Florida Court System, the Florida Probate Courts, Florida's Predatory Guardianship Racket or Florida Estate Courts.

Pam Simon of STP Enterprises, Pamela B. Simon. Arbitrage Life Payment System A.L.P.S and Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners have a clear record of Pattern and Practice as far as I see it. Do your Homework on who was REALLY disinherited and what is REALLY going on with these cases and connected INVISIBLE Insurance Policies paying MILLIONS and Non-Existing Trusts.

Research Links

Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida Deposition
http://iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/Ted%20Deposition/

Ted Bernstein Court Files
Index of /Simon and Shirley Estate/ted court files


Click the Document Below and Save the Link as I will be adding research information for you to DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE for YOURSELF.  The LINK below is an ongoing document of which I will add research links for you to learn more.

CLICK BELOW
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13af0C3ZuzAY24O4IYGwvf-opEWUJh5LHxLXsKQ1nUjw/edit


For More on the Florida Probate Case, Florida Predatory Guardian Case, Florida Fraud and Forgery Case, Palm County Probate Courts and the Estate Case involving Ted Bernstein Boca Raton Florida of Life Cycle Financial Planners, Click Below.

Thursday, November 9, 2017

The tactics of the Gang Stalking attorneys who work with Marc Randazza and I allege some judges in the past are just as evil as what we are hearing about Harvey Weinstein and worse. Many of these targeted whistleblowers are harassed and shamed into suicide. Marc Randazza is NOT above the law nor is ANY attorney, Godaddy insider, Google insider, Court Clerk, or ANYONE else who helped Randazza to silence Victims.

Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and their conspirators are CONSTANTLY active in suppressing Journalism.  They use their power and position as officers of the court to intimidate, threaten, bully, and shut down those who expose the Porn Industry secrets, expose human trafficking, EXPOSE predators, and EXPOSE the attorneys who protect them. 

Marc Randazza, Ron Green and Randazza Legal Group sidesteps the First Amendment and use any intimidation tactic available. Your hearing now of how Harvey Weinstein got a gang of investigators, lawyers, spies and more to silence and intimidate women. Randazza and his co-conspirators, I allege, do the same tactics to SILENCE journalists which is what investigative bloggers are. The BIG difference is they are OFFICERS OF THE COURT.

Randazza succeeds in removing mass content, getting huge judgments, getting bank records and phone records, alienating people by threatening to sue anyone who is connected to them or works with them and drives them into financial ruin, constant never ending fear and stress, and after years of that Randazza Legal Group WILL file in a court of law to make their VICTIM, their TARGET pay for their legal fees for attacking, harassing, tormenting, suing, defaming and ruining the Targets life. 

Just as the Weinstein case, we see large amounts of victims come out and tell the courts what officers of the court Randazza Legal Group and ALL connected attorneys are doing. And the courts have thus far protected these guys.

They actual file lawsuits against each others targets, they blog the conspired narrative in mass among many "credible" officers of the court aKa attorneys. These malicious "opinions" on blogs by officers of the court are not only deemed credible and true but they are used as actual EXHIBITS in a Court of Law as Unadjudicated yet VERY EFFECTIVE evidence against their target.

These Gang stalking Attorneys are believed over and over as their target is NOT believed, ruled against and their life is ruined. 

Check Out Jennifer Randazza and Marc Randazza suing me, Crystal Cox to shut down massive online content, steal domain names and redirect them to their commercial site, bully me, harass and threaten me. Read it all and learn how these attorneys do this.

Also research J. Devoy cases and cases that involve Judge Navarro and many unconstitutional TRO's. There are many cases out there where these guys sue a target, get the precedence they want, shut down content (Chill Speech) and get a Judgment in their favor to pay them HUGE legal fees for their fraud on the court, torturous interference, bullying, lying, threatening, HORRIFIC RETALITION.

Randazza v. Cox Docket
http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

THESE GANG STALKING ATTORNEYS threaten, sue, bully, intimidate, stalk, blog hate in mass, drive by victims homes, publish victims home address, and have a constant campaign to keep them quiet WHATEVER IT TAKES.

Alexandra Mayers was sued by Jennifer Randazza, the wife of First Amendment PORN attorney Marc Randazza. Jennifer Randazza claimed Alexandra Mayers Defamed her "per se" and painted her in False Light.  This is SERIOUSLY Laughable, a Parody, a Joke. Oh wait its a REALLY BIG DEAL. As this EVIL woman, Jennifer Randazza seems to have convinced a seemingly rogue and corrupt court to actual rule in her favor. I wonder that that cost??? "per se"

J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group represented Jennifer Randazza in this malicious UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Unlawful Lawsuit to silence and intimidate a journalist.

Alexandra Mayers / Monica Foster NEVER had an "unhealthy obsession" with Jennifer Randazza. Instead Alexandra Mayers dedicated her life to doing the right thing and reporting on the REAL "bad guys" such as Jennifer Randazza's husband and the thugs at his law firm Randazza Legal Group who were causing real harm to people.

Alexandra Mayers was reporting on them, exposing them and making fun of them as his her First Amendment Protected right. Jennifer Randazza is the one who had the VERY "unhealthy" obsession with Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers . Why not ignore the name calling? I allege that Jennifer Randazza sued Alexandra Mayers as a PROXY for her husband and his gang stalking co-conspirators to suppress Alexandra Mayers speech, steal blogs and other intellectual property, and to intimidate and bully Alexandra Mayers .

Marc Randazza has a SERIOUS "unhealthy obsession" with any woman who DARES to make fun of him, call his wife a slut, expose his illegal behavior, report on porn industry criminal allegations and unethical behavior and most of all WOMEN WHO DARE TO STAND UP TO HIM.

When Jennifer Randazza Gets BUTTHURT she sues the Women who Stood up to her THUG of a Hubby
Check Out A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers, Defendant AND see how to SHUT down the TRUTH and use the Judicial Process for REVENGE against someone who called you a slut and made "parody" of your high profile life that has NO RIGHT to Privacy as suggested in their legal cases as a matter of law.  See the link below for Federal Judge SHUT down of these allegations.

Yet somehow the Nevada State court went along with Jennifer Randazza???

Was Jennifer Randazza connected to Organized Crime or Pornography? Ummm geee Duh, all you have to do is look at Marc Randazza's blogs, or pool parties with predators they took their kids to as seen in this Arbitration.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing

Jennifer Randazza and Marc Randazza I ALLEGE have Committed SERIOUS "INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT" in Mass and have used the power of our legal system to do it.

A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers, Clark County Nevada Rob Bare, Bonnie Bulla Case Docket Linked Below
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing

How in the World did Clark County Courts let Jennifer Randazza get away with these knowingly false pleadings and I allege perjury? Well who knows? I do know the TRUTH has a tendency to comet out. SO one day that too will surface from the "False Light" to the "True Light".

We all thought that Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and set up a meeting to discuss trying to get away from Marc Randazza. I FULLY believed that to be true, so did other followers of Monica's blogs. As someone claiming to be Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, that really happened.

Monica posted on her blog about the meeting, and yeah to Divorce Marc Randazza would be to leave #organisedcrime and #prostitution as that is the industry he works in as the RECORD everywhere CLEARLY shows. So to sue Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers

Jennifer Randazza made false and SERIOUSLY HARMFUL statements about me Crystal Cox and did see in sworn to be true court filings. Flat out LIES, Defamation and False Light to a Federal Court about me, yet that's ok? Why? Because it is my life SHE ruined in suing me?


None of Jennifer Randazza's allegations are "highly offensible" to the "reasonable person" and even if poor baby Jennifer Randazza was offended SO WHAT. The Randazza's are the Face out there on the TV and in other mass media fighting for the right to OFFEND People.

Jennifer Randazza YOU DO NOT GET THE LUXURY OF BEING "OFFENDED" 

Again See The Court Order Below. Jennifer Randazza does not get to claim this shit, as a matter of LAW.  Summary Judgement DENIAL in Randazza c. Cox. Jennifer Randazza is NOT above the Law.
http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf


I allege that Jennifer Randazza perjured herself in this case and I hope to soon file criminal charges myself as Jennifer Randazza is a very dangerous woman, using the power of our judicial system and her officer of the court husband to SHUT DOWN women who call her out, tell the truth about her and her husband and make fun of Jennifer Randazza.

Jennifer Randazza had such an Unhealthy Obsession with me, Crystal Cox, that she sued me for around 30 million and her husband and his law firm took my intellectual property in MASS to shut down my Speech about the RANDAZZAS.

These Free Speech hating Jackasses simply removed my blogs about princess Jennifer Randazza.  So we may never get to the bottom of this Slut thing or allegations of how Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza really met? Got a Tip?  ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com


We shall examine the Whole Is or Was Jennifer Randazza a Slut thing

Well Marc Randazza sure does describe what I allege is a SLUT, check it out
"we had a particularly spirited drunken tryst that day. Yep, some great scuba diving, some great mojitos with some of my best friends, a little whisper of “lets go take a nap,” in my ear, and a new life begins."
Source and Full Drunken Tryst
https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/

Oh and Check out Marc Randazza Defending Rush Limbaugh to call Sandra Fluke a SLUT, but We Dare not call Drunken Tryst get knocked up by a Porn Attorney clearly using no protection Jennifer Brochey Randazza a SLUT, how dare we

Check this out
http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-j-randazza-says-ms-mayers-got-sued.html

Oh and this one, at 1;15 into it is a discussion where going after another guys wife is a First Amendment RIGHT but not for Crystal Cox or Alexandra Mayers, NOPE Sue Them.

Check it out



And don't forget Joseph Rakofsky

Joseph Rakofsky explained in great detail what these guys were doing and that was years ago. Still our Courts let this behavior continued. I mean who is going to disbelieve a bunch of attorneys saying the same thing and even bloggging flat out lies about people that is then used by the other attorneys in court cases as UNADJUDICATED yet effective Evidence against their target.

Joseph Rakofsky AGAIN told the courts exactly what these attorneys were doing and the Courts simply ignored the victims and chose the bad guy attorneys. Meanwhile the litigant/victim is discredited in mass by their gang of attorneys, forensic accountants, journalists and judges.

Open Letter I wrote to Joseph Rakofsky
http://proofofcorruption.blogspot.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html

JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, and RAKOFSKY LAW FIRM, P.C.,
                                                                                   INDE)( NO.: 105573/11
Plaintiffs,
-against

THE WASHINGTON POST, et aI.,
Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROTECTING THEM.

THESE GUYS REALLY DID GANG UP ON THIS GUY TO PROTECT THE LIES AND BAD, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF ONE OF THEIR OWN.

A Few Research Links on  Rakofsky v. the Internet.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/17292223040/judge-not-impressed-rakofsky-v-internet-dismisses-defamation-claims.shtml

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110524/23465814426/recent-law-school-grad-gets-berated-judge-then-sues-nearly-everyone-who-discussed-case.shtml

Joseph Rakofsky reported the Truth and experienced Judicial Retaliation in mass.

And there are many More. The Courts know and thus far have let these guys continue to use this same tactic in State and Federal Courts. I Allege over and over that all Marc Randazza, Ronald Green, J. Devoy and ALL the attorneys named in the cases above really are and have done this stuff and the courts NEED to stop letting them get away with it.

Some more Drunken Tryst Research
http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=tryst

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Americans Against Guardianship Abuse Corruption in the Courts, Elder Abuse, Guardians extortion of Wards and their families and more by Sam Sugar, MD.

"Some hard realities we must now disclose.

As we watch victims from every corner of America plead for our help day after day; as we watch  judges make a mockery of justice in probate courts around the country; as lives and fortunes are demolished on the altar of voracious greed; as we witness the rapidly accelerating erosion of trust in our bedrock institutions of law we cannot help but come to some alarming conclusions.
Now, we must stand and state for all to realize that:

1. Juryless probate guardianship proceedings are illegal, but are being masqueraded by the wealth extractors as constitutional due process, in order to steal the assets of innocent American citizens in contravention of law.

2. Essentially all state probate court guardianship proceedings are being carried out illegally and without jurisdiction.

3. The having knowledge of this wrongdoing, and failing to take appropriate action is a crime in and of itself.

4. All knowledge of such wrongdoing and suspected wrongdoing are the jurisdiction of the local grand jury panels of the applicable district/state/territory. American citizens have the absolute right and obligation to report these wrongdoings directly to these grand jury panels, as well as to any governmental agency. Any obstruction of these types of lawfully mandated reports are a Federal & State offense, Obstruction of justice, jury witness & evidence tampering.

The startling truth is that for decades innocent older Americans have been raped and pillaged under color of Law by an out of control segment of the elite court insider class who have abused the sacred but misplaced immunity they enjoy.

They have perverted our laws and bent them to their greedy and criminal will. They have betrayed their oath, their profession and their country.

They have committed heinous crimes and even resorted to torture to suppress exposure of their sadistic behavior.

Unless we rise up as one to combat this legalised cult of predation none of us is safe.
More to come."

A typical civil court procedure: "You are free to leave this court once you give us all your money in the form of unnecessary & unwanted legal fees, that I, as judge, will ensure you are charged. You WILL pay these legal fees.".

A typical civil court procedure: "You are free to leave this court once you give us all your money in the form of unnecessary & unwanted legal fees, that I, as judge, will ensure you are charged. You WILL pay these legal fees.".

Source and Full Judicial Corruption / Guardianship Article
http://aaapg.net/some-hard-realities-we-must-now-disclose/

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Challenges by Liberty Media

Marc Randazza Bankruptcy and Liberty Media

"In the meantime, Randazza's old employer, Liberty Media, is challenging his Nevada court filing seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In that filing, Randazza claimed assets of up to $10 million, and liabilities of up to $50 million. Randazza included in his liabilities a potential $10 million judgement against him in a lawsuit with a blogger, Crystal Cox of Washington; $1 million to Liberty; as well as another $1 million judgement against him in a lawsuit he's embroiled in with Roca Labs of Largo, Florida."

Source and More
http://1701news.com/node/1183/so-who-klingon-lawyer-marc-randazza.html

Liberty Media Opposition Motion (Doc. 38)
"In an effort to avoid payment of the entire monetary component of the IAA, and before the
IAA could be confirmed by the state court, Debtor, by and through its counsel L&Z, initiated
settlement negotiations with E/L. During these negotiations, Debtor consistently used the threat of
a bankruptcy petition in an attempt to negotiate a sum of payment significantly reduced from that
awarded to E/L in the IAA. Not only did Debtor use the threat of bankruptcy as a cudgel, but he andhis allegedly estranged wife have initiated sealed divorce proceedings, and dissipated assets."

"Debtor attempted delay for two reasons: (1) in a misguided effort to stay the award of attorneys fees by the Arbitrator, as well as the confirmation of the IAA by the state court; and (2) to push the date of petition out more than 90 days, so that Debtor’s fraudulent, improper, and preferential transfers could not be clawed back, including payments to his attorneys L&Z.

According to Debtor’s schedules filed on September 11, 2015, Debtor has deposited with
L&Z sums totaling $94,000. [ECF 15] On September 22, 2015, L&Z filed the instant Application
to Employ and Retain Larson & Zirzow, LLC as Attorneys for the Debtor Nunc Pro Tunc to the
Petition Date."

"According to the retainer agreements and statements made therein, L&Z entered into
representation of Debtor as of June 11, 2015 for “pre-bankruptcy settlement negotiations and to
attend a settlement conference. The Debtor paid L&Z a flat fee of $10,000.00 for this engagement.”

"L&Z also purports to have been retained, via two separate retainer agreements, for representation in both a bankruptcy action, and a potential adversary proceeding."

"the second was for potential nondischargeability litigation. "

"L&Z’s Application is deficient as it relates to exactly what the scope of services are that it
has billed for as of yet. In fact, L&Z only informs as to the fact that it has received a total sum of
$94,000 for legal services in connection with Debtor’s Chapter 11 case. “Of this sum, L&Z billed
and was paid the sum of $26,908.82 prior to the Petition Date, and L&Z currently holds in trust the
remainder sum of $67,091.18 (the “Remaining Retainer”) a portion of which has been allocated
pursuant to the Representation Agreements for potential adversary proceedings.” [ECF 18 at ¶16 (emphasis added)] This Application utterly fails to identify and delineate what services were
provided totaling $26,908.82."

"In any event, all transfers were made within 90 days of the filing of Debtor’s Petition. As
such, the “pre-bankruptcy” retainer fees charged and collected by L&Z constitute an avoidable
preferential transfer, and the funds must be clawed back to the estate. As a result, L&Z will lose
their status as “disinterested parties” and are therefore not qualified to serve as attorneys for the
Debtor.

II. L&Z’S APPLICATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE TEST FOR
APPROVAL OF HIRING OF PROFESSIONALS.

L&Z’s employment as attorneys for the debtor in possession in a Chapter 11 case is
governed by § 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires court approval for the attorney's
employment. The bankruptcy court is charged with “ensur[ing] that attorneys who represent the
debtor do so in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate.” In re Park–Helena Corp., 63 F.3d 877,
880 (9th Cir.1995). Under § 327, an attorney for a debtor cannot “hold or represent an interest
adverse to the estate”; he or she must be a “disinterested person.” 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).

Any creditor of the estate, or anyone with “an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate ... by reason  of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the debtor,” is not a disinterested person. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(14)(A), (C). A “creditor” includes any “entity that has a
claim against the debtor that arose at the time of or before the order for relief concerning the
debtor.” § 101(10)(A). A “claim” includes any “right to payment.” § 101(5)(A).
To enable the Bankruptcy Court to evaluate an attorney's potential employment, Rule
2014(a) requires that an application for employment of an attorney under § 327 “shall be
accompanied by a verified statement of the person to be employed setting forth the person's
connections with the debtor, creditors, any other party in interest, their respective attorneys and
accountants, the United States trustee, or any person employed in the office of the United States
trustee.” Fed. R. Bankr.P. 2014(a). This disclosure requirement is applied “strictly.” Park–Helena,
63 F.3d at 881.

An attorney approved for employment under § 327 must apply for interim or final
compensation, which is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court. 11 U.S.C. §§ 328–31; see also
In re Chapel Gate Apartments, Ltd., 64 B.R. 569, 575 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1986) (noting that “fees in
bankruptcy cases ... are subject to review, modification, and outright cancellation by the Court”).
Rule 2016(a) requires an attorney seeking compensation and/or reimbursement of expenses to file
an application “setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the services rendered, time expended and
expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.”

The fee application must also include, inter alia, “a statement as to what payments have theretofore been made or promised to the applicant for services rendered or to be rendered in any capacity whatsoever in connection with the case, [and] the source of the compensation so paid or promised.” Id. After notice and a hearing, the court may award “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered,” as well as “reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses.” §330(a)(1)."

Source and Full Filing
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.38.0.pdf


Liberty Media Move for Order to Modify Stay
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.0.pdf

Doc. 60-2 to above Motion
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.2.pdf

Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award Exhibit - 60-6
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.6.pdf

Liberty Media Reply
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.80.0.pdf

COMPLAINT by Liberty Media and Others to Determine Non-Dischargeable Debt
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.83.0.pdf

Doc. 120 filed by Liberty Media, First Amended Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.120.0.pdf

Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Case Docket
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html


Doc. 148 Settlement
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.148.0.pdf
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.157.0.pdf

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING EXAMINATION
PURSUANT TO FED.R.BANKR.P.2004 OF MARC J. RANDAZZA
Doc. 187

"Creditors Excelsior Media Corp. (“Excelsior”) and Liberty Media Holdings, LLC
(“Liberty” and together with Excelsior, “Creditors”), by and through their counsel, James D.
Greene, Esq. of Greene Infuso, LLP pursuant to section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code and Rule
2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 2004 of the Local Rules of
Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure, hereby apply to the Court for entry of order directing Debtor
Marc J. Randazza (“Debtor”) to appear for and submit to examination under oath before certified court reporter at the office of Greene Infuso, LLP, 3030 South Jones Blvd. Suite 101, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 on a date and time to be determined, providing that notice of said examination is to be provided no less than 10 judicial days before such examination date. In support of this
application (“Application”), Creditors state as follows:

LEGAL ARGUMENT

An examination pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 can be ordered [o]n motion of any
party in interest.” In re Stasz, 387 B.R. 271, 273 n.3 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008); see also In re Lifeco
Inv. Grp., Inc., 173 B.R. 478, 480 (Bankr. D. Del 1994), quoting Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004(a).
Bankruptcy Rule 2004 further provides that the Court may order the examination and the
production of documentary evidence concerning any matter that relates “to the liabilities and
financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the
debtor’s estate, or… any other matter relevant to the case or tot the formulation of a plan.” Fed.
R. Bankr. P. 2004(b); see also In re Dinubilo, 177 B.R. 932, 936 n.6 (E.D. Cal. 1993) (noting that
“[u]nder Rule 2004, a court may order the examination of any person on motion of any party in
interest.”). 

Generally, examinations under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 are for the “purpose of
discovering assets and unearthing frauds.” In re Rafsky, 300 B.R. 152, 153 n.2 (Bankr. D. Conn.
2003) (citation omitted); In re N. Plaza LLC, 395 B.R. 113, 122 n.9 (S.D. Cal. 2008).
The scope of a Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination is “unfettered and broad,” as the plain
language of the rule indicates. See 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2004.02[1] at 2004-6 (15th ed. Rev.
1997); In re Dinublilo, 177 B. R. at 939 quoting In re GHR Energy Corp., 33 B.R. 451, 453
(Bankr. D. Mass. 1983). 

The broad latitude of Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination furthers the purpose of the rule, which is “to allow the court to gain a clear picture of the condition and the whereabouts of the bankrupt’s estate. In re Int’l Fibercom, Inc., 283 B.R. 290, 292 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2002) (permitted Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination aimed at “obtaining information that will … potentially uncover additional claims that may exist for the benefit of the estate”); see also In re W & S Investments, Inc., 985 F.2d 577 (9th Cir. 1993) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004 is a broadly construed discovery device…”); In re French, 145 B. R 991, 992 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1992) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004… does not offer the procedural safeguards available under Rule 26 of the Federal Rule Rules of Civil Procedure.”)."

"The information and documents which Creditors seek through this Application relate to
matters that are clearly with the permitted scope of Rule 2004, including: (i) property of the
Debtor’s bankruptcy estate; (ii) transactions and business dealings involving the Debtor and
family members and corporate entities; (iii) potential claims the Creditor may have against third
parties; and (iv) other matters affecting the administration of the Debtor’s estate."

Source and Full Document

Above Order Granted
http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.188.0.pdf


Doc. 191 Liberty Media SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR ORDER CONFIRMING INTERIMARBITRATION AWARD
http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.191.0.pdf


CAN YOU SAY PATTERN AND HISTORY ???